Wednesday, January 31, 2007

Talk Radio, our last freedom?

Let’s Make U.S. Heritage disappear

Carl Marx discovered that if you deny the very existence of God, this was the most effective way to control peoples thinking and promote the State as “god”. Although he believed in God, as he was a Satanist, he hated the Church, so he used science to dispute even the very existence of God.

Adolph Hitler also hated the Church, his philosophy leaned towards the teachings of Niche, the philosopher that said “I think therefore I am”, another humanistic anti God world view.

Many left leaning politicians and professors love to espouse the very same world view.

Yet continually use NAZI Germany in the late 1930’s as an example of silencing any decent from their viewpoints. This is identical in substance to any tyranny throughout history.

A good example of this is the recent proposal to have the Government control talk radio.

Talk radio by its very nature optimizes our freedom of speech, it is a two way medium directly involving the population.

In contrast, TV broadcasts, the printed word, recordings ect, allow no interaction with the population, it is simply one way communication tool.

This is precisely why the Nazi’s and other tyrants could not have allowed talk radio in their times!

By its very nature it would stand in the way of silencing their opposition politically, and would have exposed their agenda viewpoints. Only some one who is scared of being exposed would ever implement such a policy.

The Constitution ensures that Americans can enjoy these freedoms. However, if the Constitution is not protected for what it says, and is reinterpreted to mean something other than it says it becomes just a worthless piece of old papers.

This is why an understanding of tried and true Constitutional Law must be adhered to, and activist Judges have no place in this process.

Just think what would have happened if activist Judges would have changed the meaning to our Constitution throughout history or if extremist would have gotten in power and interpreted it to mean what they wanted it to mean.

If Constitutional law is not strictly enforced devoid of politics’, It becomes a worthless piece of paper. A friend of mine from New York explained to me that the law means nothing without enforcement. If any Tyrant can remove the voice of the people, and change the meaning of our heritage within the United States, he has effectively overthrown the Constitution.

This is the danger of historical revisionists, and “educational activists”. This is why the Supreme Court nominations must have a background in Constitutional law and U.S. history.

This is also precisely why the founding fathers in this Country so fervently pushed the Idea of a Creator. They knew that without accountability to a Supreme Being, tyranny and kayos would be the result.

Western Values

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.